This also shows that Apple does prioritise performance over its battery life.Īpple claims that the Pro offers 70% faster processing speeds than the M1 chip, which makes it ideal for those who need a high-end performance. The M1 Pro chip comes with up to 10 CPU cores, which are made up of eight high-performance cores and two power-efficient cores, also known as P-cores and E-cores. While the lower configuration will still be powerful, the added cores in the beefed-up variation allow your laptop to run multiple processes at the same time with greater ease, which should provide a smoother and faster experience overall. The larger-screened 16-inch MacBook Pro also packs the full-fat M1 Pro chip, with a starting price of $2499/£2399. If you’re after a more powerful performance, you can upgrade and get the M1 Pro chip that comes with a 10-core CPU and 16-core GPU, which costs an extra £300. Looking at the 14-inch MacBook Pro, the M1 Pro variation starts out at $1999/£1899, coming with eight CPU cores and 14 GPU cores. There were rumours that the Mac Mini would see a refresh including the M1 Pro and M1 Mac chipset, though it now looks like it will skip past the M1 range and dive straight into the M2 range, though this has not been confirmed by Apple. It’s expected to be available in other Apple devices soon, with the iMac Pro having the best chance. Expect an M2 Pro and M2 Max to come to those machines later and offer similar second-generation gains.The M1 Pro chip has already made its debut and is available to buy in both the 14 and 16-inch MacBook Pro laptops. But unsurprisingly, it's no replacement for the M1 Pro and M1 Max found in the 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro models. Note that Final Cut Pro is particularly well-optimized among its peers for Apple's silicon and multithreaded performance, so the differences might not be as dramatic with other video editing applications.Īll these tests tell a consistent story: The M2 is a generational step up over the M1, especially regarding graphics. The M1 Pro and M1 Max were still the ultimate winners at 43 and 30 seconds, respectively. The 13-inch MacBook Pro with the M2 chip took 66 seconds, crushing the M1's 103 seconds. We exported a 34-second video at 4K resolution and 60 frames per second with several expensive effects applied. The Final Cut Pro test was predictably a bigger spread. The M2 built the app in 49 seconds-that's only barely slower than the M1 Pro and the M1 Max, and it smokes the M1's 61 seconds. In all cases, our test machines had the highest core count configuration available for the chip included.įurther Reading Apple makes Xcode Cloud available to all developersFor the Xcode test, we did a quick build of the relatively lightweight VLC app for the iPad. To that end, we tested the 2022 13-inch MacBook Pro (with the M2), 2020 13-inch MacBook Pro (M1), 2021 14-inch MacBook Pro (M1 Pro), and another 2021 14-inch MacBook Pro (M1 Max). So our focus here will be on comparing all the chips in Apple's current laptop lineup: the M1, M2, M1 Pro, and M1 Max. (If not, that's a bigger question than we can answer in this review.) With Macs living in a different ecosystem, operating system, and architecture than Windows laptops, you probably already know before this comparison whether you're going with Windows (or Chrome OS or Linux) or a Mac for your next machine. When Apple unveiled the M2 at WWDC earlier this month, it claimed that the chip offers 18 percent faster multithreaded CPU performance compared to the M1, but the GPU supposedly gets the most impressive boost: up to 35 percent faster.īefore we get into the test results, let's quickly survey which machines we're comparing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |